Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Volume 3 Issue 2 Year 2020

Looking through the Lens of Complexity Theory: An Evaluation of Climate Change and Coronavirus 2019 Outbreak

Raymond Ndubisi Anyanwu
Seychelles Institute of Teacher Education
Published May 29, 2020
  • Looking through,
  • lens,
  • complexity theory,
  • evaluation,
  • climate change,
  • coronavirus 2019 outbreak
  • ...More
How to Cite
Anyanwu, R. N. (2020). Looking through the Lens of Complexity Theory: An Evaluation of Climate Change and Coronavirus 2019 Outbreak. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(2), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir2034

Plum Analytics


When world leaders and delegates convened in Madrid, Spain in December 2019 for the 25th Congress of Parties (COP-25) to re-evaluate their obligations to the Paris Agreement on climate change, they could not prefigure coronavirus was about to overrun humanity. Virtually everyone describes climate change as the most complex ecological and social crisis confronting society in this century. When coronavirus outbreak struck humanity in December 2019, virtually everyone also describes it as the most complex crisis that had struck mankind since the end of Second World War. Both crises have also attracted significant response from policymakers; yet no research has weighed these two common challenges of our time side-by-side in a single study to establish whether they have equivalent level of complexity. This is crucial because confronting a problem without first understanding its complexity would culminate in a waste of resources and or failure to find a permanent solution to it. To address this concern, this paper evaluates global climate change and corona-virus 2019 outbreak using complexity theory as a conceptual framework, and makes recommendations for policy and research based on the outcomes.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. American Geosciences Institute, 2019. What is the evidence that our present day climate is changing? Available at: https://www.americangeosciences.org/critical-issues/faq/what-is-evidence-that-climate-changing. Accessed on 22/4/2019
  2. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Working Group 2: Fifth Assessment Report. Available at: http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/IPCC_WG2AR5_SPM_Approved.pdf.
  3. United Nations Climate Change Secretariate, 2019. Yearbook of Global Climate Action 2019: Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action. Bonn: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/GCA_Yearbook2019.pdf
  4. WHO, 2020a. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 59. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200319-sitrep-59-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=c3dcdef9_2
  5. WHO, 2020b. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 107. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200506covid-19-sitrep-107.pdf?sfvrsn=159c3dc_2
  6. WHO 2020c. What is Pandemic? Available at: http://www.who.int.icrs/diseases/swneflu/frequently-asked-questions/pandemic/en. Accessed on: 4 April 2020.
  7. Anderson, C., Tornberg, A. and Tornberg, P. 2014. Societal systems: complex or worse? Futures, 63:145-157
  8. Poli, R. 2013. A note on the difference between simple, complicated and complex social systems. Cadmus, 2 (1), 142-147.
  9. Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. New York: Routledge.
  10. Rycroft-Malone, J. 2018. From Linear to Complicated to Complex: Comment on “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation”. International Journal of Health Policyand Management, 7(6), 566–568.
  11. Glouberman, S. and Zimmerman, B. 2002. Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform on medicare look like. Commission on the Future of Healthcare in Canada. Discussion Paper No. 8.
  12. Synder, S. 2013. The simple, the complicated and the complex: Educational Reforms Through the lens of Complexity Theory. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 96. OECD Publishing.
  13. Fischer, A., Greiff, S. and Funke, J. 2012. The Process of Solving Complex Problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4 (1), 19-42.
  14. Hansen, M. P. 2013. How to lead complex situations. Military Studies Magazine: Contemporary Conflicts. 1 (1), 1-6.
  15. Tamasaitiene, J. and Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. The Multi-Stage Decision Making System for Complicated Problems. World Conference on Psychology and Sociology 2012.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82 (2013), 215 – 219.
  16. Wolf-Brangin, M. 2013. Using Complexity Theory for Research and Programme Evaluation. Oxford Scholarship. Online.
  17. Fitzgibbon, J. and Mensah, K. 2012. Climate change as a wicked problem: An evaluation of institutional for rural water management in Ghana. Sage Open (April/June 2020), 1-4.
  18. Giudice, J. M. 2016. Through the lens of complex system theory: Why regulators must understand the economy and society as a complex system. University of Richmond, UR Scholarship Repository. Law Student Publications. School of Law. Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-student-publications
  19. Jones, H. 2011. Taking responsibility for complex: How implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  20. Dörner, D. and Funke, J. 2017. Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:1153.
  21. Sun, J. and Yang, K. 2016. The wicked problem of climate change: A new approach based on social mess and fragmentation. Sustainability, 8(12), 1312.
  22. Williams, B. and van’t Hof, S. 2014. Wicked Solutions: A Systems Approach to Complex Problems. A Workbook.
  23. National Academy of Science. 2012. Climate Change: Evidence, Impacts, and Choices. Answers to common questions about the science of climate change. Available at: http://www.ianas.org/book/climate-change.pdf
  24. The Royal Society. 2019. Climate Change: Evidence and Cause. Available at: https://royalesociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/
  25. United Nations Statistics Division, 2016. Section 5.3: Climate change. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/environment/Climate%20Change/ClimateChange_FDES.pdf
  26. Clarivate Analytics, 2020. Disease Briefing: Coronaviruses. Available at: https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2020/01/CORONAVIRUS-REPORT-1.30.2020.pdf
  27. European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) Rapid Risk Assessment: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK – sixth update.
  28. Lin, Q., Zhao, S., Gao, D. et al. 2020. A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China with individual reaction and governmental action. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 93 (2020), 211–216.
  29. WHO, 2020d. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 13 April 2020. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19--13-april-2020
  30. United States Centre for Disease Control, 2020. COVID-19: People who are at higher risk for severe illness. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-precautions/people-at-risk.html Accessed 6 April 2020
  31. Pang, J., Wang, M. X., Ang, I. Y. et al. 2020. Potential Rapid Diagnostics, Vaccine and Therapeutics for 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV): A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9 (623), 1-33.
  32. The Week, April 08, 2020 09:22: Trump accuses WHO of 'China bias', threatens to withhold funds. Available at: https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2020/04/08/trump-accuses-who-of-china-bias-threatens-to-withhold-funds.html
  33. Frost, N. 2019. Yet again, climate change is the greatest facing our world. Available at: https://q.2.com/1527290/yet-again-climate-change-is-the-greatest-threat-facing-our-world/ Accessed on 22 April 2019.
  34. Goodland, R. and Counsell, S. 2008. Climate change and the energy crisis. Policy Matters, 16(October 2008), 12-68.
  35. Jakob, M. and Stecke, J. C. 2016. Implications of climate change mitigation for sustainable development. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (2016), 1-9.
  36. Thapa, P. L. 2015. Climate change and the agriculture crisis: Agroecology as a solution. New Delhi: Focus on the Global South, India.
  37. National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Climate and Social Stress: Implications for the security analysis. National Academies Report Brief, November 2012. Available at: https://www.nap.edu/resource/14682/dbasse_073254.pdf.Change: Evidence, Impacts and Choices
  38. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Working Group 2: Fifth Assessment Report. Available at: http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/IPCC_WG2AR5_SPM_Approved.pdf. (This Reference same in second one)
  39. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2013. Climate Change and Security. Available at: http://www.iisd.org/ecp/es/climate/
  40. Evans, O. 2020. Socioeconomic impact of novel coronavirus: The policy solutions. Bizeons Quarterly, 7 (2020), 3-12.
  41. Ayittley, F. K.; Ayittley, M. K.; Chiwero, N. B.; Kumasah, J. S. and Dzuvor, C. 2020. Economic impacts of Wuhan 2019-nCoV on China and the world. Journal of Medical Virology, 92 (5),
  42. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2018. The 2018 Climate Accountability Scorecard Insufficient Progress from Major Fossil Fuel Companies. Available at: https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-accountability-scorecard18-report.pdf
  43. Carter, R. M. 2010. Climate: The counter consensus. London: Stacey.
  44. Anyanwu, R. N. and Le Grange, L. 2018. The nature of climate science: Challenges for the development of climate change science literacy in education. African International Journal Multidisciplinary Research (AIJMR), 2 (5), 24-34.
  45. Chang, C. and Pascua, L. 2017. The state of climate change education- reflections from a selection of studies around the world. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26 (3), 177-179.
  46. Crisis Group, 2020. COVID-19 and Conflict: Seven Trends to Watch. Crisis Group Special Briefing N°4, 24 March 2020. Available at: https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/B004-covid-19-seven-trends.pdf
  47. Akpan, N. 2020. Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year. Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/04/why-coronavirus-vaccine-could-take-way-longer-than-a-year/
  48. Amanat, F. and Krammer, F. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: Status Report. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/reader/pii/S1074761320301205/pdf