Vol 2 No 3 (2019): Volume 2, Issue 3, Year 2019

Impact of Faculty Student Rapport on Classroom Environment

Deeksha Thakur
Research Scholar, School of Management, The North Cap University, Gurgaon, India.
Charu Shri
Adjunct Professor, Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, New Delhi, India.
Vij A.K.
Adjunct Professor, Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, New Delhi, India.
Published September 9, 2019
  • Rapport,
  • classroom environment,
  • correlation,
  • t-test,
  • higher education
How to Cite
Thakur, D., Shri, C., & A.K., V. (2019). Impact of Faculty Student Rapport on Classroom Environment. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(3), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1935

Plum Analytics


Rapport-building is a well-known construct and so is Classroom Environment (CRE). Faculty-student rapport (FSR) in higher education is perceived to enhance motivational level, comfort level, communication and eventually learning. Connecting with students also leads to better student engagement in the learning process. A lot has been said about faculty-student rapport by theoreticians however research needs to measure its impact empirically. This research paper measures impact of FSR on CRE in the institutions imparting management and engineering education in NCR, India. Objective of this paper is to establish whether a positive correlation exists between FSR and CRE. Other objectives of this paper are to evaluate if stream of education (engineering/management) and gender of teacher have significant impact on FSR.

Data was collected from 800 students from private institutions of National Capital Region (NCR), India using Professor-Student Rapport Scale and The College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI) questionnaire. The impact of FSR on CRE has been measured through Pearson Correlation. The impact of stream of education (engineering/management) and gender of teacher on FSR have been measured through T-test. This research paper primarily measures student perception.

Pearson correlation on this data size of 800 affirmed that there exists a positive correlation between Faculty-student rapport and Classroom Environment. T-tests determined that stream of education does not impact FSR whereas gender of the teacher impacts FSR.

Previous research has shown mixed results that FSR impacts student achievement. This does not mean that FSR should be neglected or given less importance. Faculty-student rapport impacts Classroom Environment and hence should be considered and maintained in higher education.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. D.L. Roorda, H.M.Y. Koomen, J.J. Spilt, F.J. Oort, The Influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students; engagement and achievement: A Meta-Analytis Approach, Review of Educational Research, 81 (2011) 493 -529.
  2. T.T Nugent, (2009) The Impact of Teacher-Student Interaction on Student Motivation and Achievement, Doctoral Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida. Retrieved from http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002884/Nugent_Tisome_T_200912_EdD.pdf
  3. J.A.R. Caballero, (2010) The effects of the teacher-student relationship, teacher expectancy, and culturally relevant pedagogy on student academic achievement, Doctoral dissertation, University of Redlands, California.
  4. J. Adeyele, Y. Yusuff, Effect of Teaching Method, Choice of Discipline and Student-Lecturer Relationship on Academic Performance, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3(2012) 1-7.
  5. S.J. Lee, The relations between the student-teacher trust relationship and school success in the case of Korean middle schools, Educational Studies, 33(2007) 209-216.
  6. F.A. Fan, Teacher: students’ interpersonal relationships and students’ academic achievements in social studies, Teachers and Teaching, 18(2012) 483-490.
  7. K.L. Alexander, D.R. Entwisle, C.S. Horsey, From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout, Sociology of Education, 70 (1997) 87-107.
  8. S. Gunuc, The Relationships Between Student engagement and their academic Achievement, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(2014) 216- 231.
  9. K. Krstic, Attachment in the student-teacher relationship as a factor of school achievement, Teaching Innovations, 28(2015) 167-188.
  10. T.B. Mabin Jr., (2016) Student-Teacher Connection, Race and Relationships to Academic Achievement, Doctoral Thesis, Western Michigan University, Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2415&context=dissertations
  11. S.D. Nyadanu, M.Y. Garglo, T. Adampah, & R.L. Garglo, The impact of lecturer-student relationship on self-esteem and academic performance at higher education, Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2015) 264-281
  12. K.A. Bin Abdulrahman, Students’ Views on Student-Teacher Relationship. A Questionnaire-Based Study, Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 14(2007) 81–87.
  13. A.B. Frymier, (2007) Teachers’ and students’ goals in the teaching learning process, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  14. J. Coupland, Small talk: Social functions, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2003) 1-6.
  15. K.K. Dwyer, S.G. Bingham, R.E. Carison, M. Prisbell, A.M. Cruz, & D.A. Fus, Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory, Communication Research Reports, 21(2004) 264-272.
  16. K. Campbell, C. White, D. Johnson, Leader-Member Relations as a Function of Rapport Management, Journal of Business Communication, 40 (2003) 170-194.
  17. K. Campbell, L. Davis, The Sociolinguistic Basis of Managing Rapport When Overcoming Buying Objections, Journal of Business Communication, 43 (2006) 43-46.
  18. N. Holden, (2002) Cross-Cultural Management: A Knowledge Management Perspective, Harlow, England.
  19. J. Holmes, M. Marra, Relational Practice in the Workplace: Women's Talk or Gendered Discourse, Language in Society, 33 (2004) 377-398.
  20. N. Granitz, S.K. Koernig, K.R. Harich, Now It’s Personal: Antecedents and Outcomes of Rapport Between Business Faculty and Their Students, Journal of Marketing Education, 31 (2009) 52-65.
  21. L. Robinson, A. Harris, R.Burton, Saving face: Managing rapport in a Problem-Based Learning group, Active Learning in Higher Education, 16 (2015) 11-24.
  22. J.I. Rodriguez, T.G. Plax, P. Kearney, Clarifying the Relationship between Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy and Student Cognitive Learning: Affective Learning as the Central Causal Mediator, Communication Education, 45(1996) 293-305.
  23. H. Murray, (1997) Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom, In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 171–204) Agathon, New York.
  24. J. Wilson, R.G. Ryan, J.L. Pugh, Professor-Student Rapport Scale Predicts Student, Teaching of Psychology, 37 (2010) 246-251.
  25. A. Fleming, C. Hiller, Rapport in the classroom: Problems and strategies. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 3 (2009) 84-96.
  26. J. Scrivener, (1994) Learning teaching, Macmillan Education, Oxford.
  27. W. Buskist, B.K. Saville, Creating positive emotional contexts for enhancing teaching and learning, APS Observer, (2001) 12-13.