Vol 2 No 3 (2019): Volume 2, Issue 3, Year 2019
Articles

Effectiveness of Some Reading Activities towards Improving the Reading Abilities of Primary School Pupils in Nigeria

Mkpa Agu Mkpa
Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria
Ekoh-Nweke Angela Chekwube
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria.
Published September 9, 2019
Keywords
  • Effectiveness,
  • Reading-activities,
  • Reading-abilities
How to Cite
Mkpa, M. A., & Angela Chekwube, E.-N. (2019). Effectiveness of Some Reading Activities towards Improving the Reading Abilities of Primary School Pupils in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(3), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1939

Plum Analytics

Abstract

The study sought to determine if the utilization of three reading activities in a remediation class for experimental (E) group of primary five (5) pupils who were deficient in reading would improve their reading abilities over their counterparts in the control (C) group taught the remedial lessons through the traditional teacher-centered approach. It also investigated if sex would be a significant factor in determining the performance of the treatment and control groups. Two research questions and two null hypothesis guided the study. The subjects were made up of 38 reading-deficient primary five (5) pupils randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. The data collection instrument was a researcher-made and validated reading assessment checklist, the inter-rater reliability coefficient of which yielded an index of 0.82 using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficients. The C and E group teachers received orientations on the approaches to adopt to carry out their task. Steps were taken to establish equivalence of the instructional conditions of the two groups, the only difference being the experimental treatment which consisted of the use of 3 activities: Reading chart activity, Paired reading and Command card game. After the remedial treatment experiment which lasted for three weeks of compact activities, the E and C subjects were tested with their class-appropriate reader. Results established the significant superiority of the experimental group over the control. Sex was not found to be a significant factor as no difference existed between the male and female pupils in the E and C groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. K. Tankersley, (2005) Literacy Strategies for grades 4-12, Reinforcing the threads of reading, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandra, V.A.
  2. C Young, T. Rasinki, Implementing readers theatre as an approach to classroom fluency instruction, The Reading Teacher, 63(2009) 4-13.
  3. H. Kadan, Determination of reading levels of primary school students, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(2017) 1962-1969.
  4. S. Emily, (2017) 15 reading strategies for primary learners. Retrieved from: https://www.educationtothecore.com/2017/01/15-reading-strategies-primary-learners.
  5. K. Smagorinsky, If measuring is constructed, what is it made from? Towards a cultural theory of reading, Review of Educational Research, 7(2001) 1133-1169.
  6. M. Becker, N. McElvany, M. Korenbruck, Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2010) 773-785.
  7. J.T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, W. You, (2012) Institutional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S.L. Christensons A.L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds). Handbook of Research on Student Engagements (601-634) Springer, New York, NY.
  8. S.E. Mal, A.G. Bus, To read or not read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychological Bulletin, 137(2011) 267-296.
  9. E. Schaffiner, U. Schiefele, & H. Ulferst, Reading amounts as a mediation of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension, Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2013) 369-385.
  10. Au. Wigfield, J.R. Gladstone, L. Turi, Beyond Cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension, Child Development Perspectives, 10(2016) 1-6.
  11. J.T. Guthrie, S.L. Klauda, A.N. Ho, Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents, Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2013) 9-26.
  12. A.N. Ho, J.T. Guthrine, Pattern of associations among multiple motivations and aspect of achievement in reading, Reading Psychology, 34(2013) 101-147.
  13. E.Q. Rosenzweig, A. Wigfield, What if reading is easy but important? How student’ patterns of affirming and undermining motivation for reading information text. Predict different reading outcomes, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48(2017) 133-148.
  14. R. Steensel, R. Qasdam, A. Gelderen, Affirming and undermining motivations for reading and associations with reading comprehension, age and gender, Journal of Research in Reading, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12281.
  15. H. Karen, (2019) List of important reading skills for primary students. Retrieved from https://www.theclassroom.com/list-important-reading-skills-primary-students.11439.html.
  16. L.K. Crowe, Comparison of two reading feedback strategies in improving the oral and written language performance of children with language-learning disabilities, American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 12(2003) 16-27.
  17. M. Kouider, T.H. Brian, How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in synthetic awareness skills among fifth grades, Reading Research and Instruction, 46(2006) 73-94.
  18. K. Yildirim, T. Rasinsk, S. Ales, S. Fitzgerald, B. Zimmerman, M. Yildiz, The relationship between reading fluency and vocabulary in fifth grade Turkish students, Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(2014) 72-89.
  19. K. Yildirirm, T. Rasinski, Reading fluency beyond English investigation into reading fluency in Turkish elementary students, International Electronic Journal of elementary Education, 7(2014) 97-106
  20. C. Meredith, (2017) Three methods of teaching reading, Retrieved from https://www.readandspell.com.methods-for-teaching-reading.
  21. I. IIter, Improving the reading comprehension of primary-school students at frustration-level reading through the paraphrasing. Strategy training: A multiple probe design study, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2017) 147-161.
  22. J.P. Williams, Instruction in reading comprehension for primary grade students: A focus on text structure, Journal of Special Education, 39(2005) 6-18.
  23. R.T. Vacca, J.L. Vacca, M.E. Mraz, (2011) Content Area Reading and Writing. Literacy and Learning Across the Curriculum. (10th Ed) Allyn & Bacon, Boston M.A.
  24. M. Alfassi, Reading to learn, Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students, Journal of Education Research, 97(2004) 171-184
  25. N.W. Fordham, D. Wellman, A. Sandmann, Taming the text; Engaging and supporting students in social studies reading. Social Studies, 93(2002) 149-158.
  26. J.R. Toste, D. Fuchs, L.S. Fuchs, (2013) Supporting struggling readers in high school in R.T Boo, V.G. Spencer (Eds.) Adolescent Literacy, Bahimore M.D. Brookes.
  27. C. Biancarosa, C.E. Snow, (2006) Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high-school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New-York. (2nd ed) Alliance for Excellent Education, Washington D.C.
  28. T. Shanahan, C. Shanahan, Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy, Harvard Educational Review, 78(2008) 40-59.
  29. S.M.R. Watson, R.A. Gable, S.B. Gear, & K.C. Hughes, Evidence-based strategies for improving the reading comprehension of secondary students: Implications for students with learning disabilities, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 27(2012) 79-89.
  30. M.A. Mastropien, T.E. Scruggs, J.E. Graetz, Reading Comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenge for struggling students and teachers, Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2003) 103-116.
  31. J.L Hagaman, R. Reid, The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading, Remedial and Social Education, 29(2008) 222-234.
  32. M Ulusory, & H Dedeogu, Content area reading and writing. Practices and beliefs, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2011) 1-17.
  33. B.E Cullinan, Independent reading and school achievement, Research Journal of the American Association of School Libraries, 2(2000) 1-24.